Higher Risk
 
Medium Risk
 
Info n/a
 
Lower Risk
Bilateral exchange of information
Agreements in place?
    No
Sanctions:

None applicable

____________________________________________________

Offshore Jurisdiction Blacklists:

Information unavailable.

____________________________________________________

US State Department Money Laundering Report - 2011:

The Gambia is not a regional financial center, although it is a
regional re-export center. Goods and capital are freely and legally
traded in the Gambia, and, as is the case in other re-export
centers, smuggling of goods occurs. Customs officials cooperate
with counterparts in Senegal to combat smuggling along their
common border, although The Gambia has limited capacity to fully
monitor its porous borders. The lack of resources hinders law
enforcement’s ability to combat possible smuggling despite
political will. The Gambia is not a known money laundering hub in
the region. It is unknown to what extent laundering is related to
narcotics, but the seizure of more than two tons of cocaine in May
and June 2010 has heightened concerns that some drug-related
money may be getting into the country. The rapid growth of
commercial banks entering the local market in the past few years,
currently 14, also raises possible money laundering concerns.

DO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ENGAGE IN CURRENCY
TRANSACTIONS RELATED TO INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS
TRAFFICKING THAT INCLUDE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF US
CURRENCY; CURRENCY DERIVED FROM ILLEGAL SALES IN
THE U.S.; OR THAT OTHERWISE SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT THE
U.S.: NO

CRIMINALIZATION OF MONEY LAUNDERING:

“All serious crimes” approach or “list” approach to predicate
crimes: List approach

Legal persons covered: criminally: YES civilly: YES

CRIMINALIZATION OF TERRORIST FINANCING:

Ability to freeze terrorist assets without delay: YES

UN lists of designated terrorists or terrorist entities distributed to
financial institutions: YES

KNOW-YOUR-CUSTOMER RULES:

Covered entities: Banks and insurance companies

Enhanced due diligence procedures for PEPs: Foreign: YES
Domestic: NO

SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:

Covered entities: Banks, insurance companies, money
exchanges, money transfer agencies, real estate agencies, credit
unions, casinos, and lotteries

Number of STRs received and time frame: Not available

Number of CTRs received and time frame: Not available

MONEY LAUNDERING CRIMINAL
PROSECUTIONS/CONVICTIONS:

Prosecutions: 12 in 2010

Convictions: Three - May to December 2010

Assets forfeited: criminally: $24,358 in 2010 civilly: Not available

RECORDS EXCHANGE MECHANISM:

With U.S.: YES

With other governments/jurisdictions: YES

The Gambia is a member of the Intergovernmental Action Group
against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA), a Financial
Action Task Force-style regional body. Its most recent mutual
evaluation can be found here: http://www.giaba.org/index.php?
type=c&id=42&mod=2&men=2

ENFORCEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES AND
COMMENTS:

The Government of The Gambia (GOTG) should examine its re-
export sector to determine whether it is being used to launder
criminal proceeds. The 2003 Money Laundering Act, currently
under review, should be expanded to include a comprehensive
range of predicate offenses and designated non-financial
businesses and professions. The GOTG should provide adequate
resources and capacity to its law enforcement, supervisory and
customs personnel so they are able to effectively fulfill their
responsibilities. Its fledgling financial intelligence unit should be
given autonomy and should be strengthened both in terms of
personnel and training to help it operate effectively. The GOTG
should become a party to the UN International Convention for the
Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and the UN Convention
against Corruption.

____________________________________________________

US State Dept Narcotics Report 2011 (introduction):

No report available

For Full report, click here

____________________________________________________

US State Dept Trafficking in Persons Report 2011
(introduction):

(Tier 2 Watch List)

The Gambia is a source, transit, and destination country for
children and women subjected forced labor and sex trafficking.
Within The Gambia, women and girls and, to a lesser extent, boys
are subjected to sex trafficking and domestic servitude. In the
past, boys attending Koranic schools run by teachers known as
marabouts were often forced to beg in the streets, but the
Government of The Gambia reports that an increasing number of
marabouts now force children into street vending, where they are
more difficult to identify. Women, girls, and boys from West
African countries − mainly Senegal, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ghana,
Nigeria, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, and Benin – are recruited for
exploitation in the sex trade in The Gambia, in particular to meet
the demands of European tourists seeking sex with children.
Observers believe organized networks use travel agencies to
promote child sex tourism, though none have been uncovered.
There are reports that Europe-bound smuggling operations
transiting Cape Verde and the Canary Islands using fishing boat
include trafficking victims, but these reports may be based on a
failure to distinguish human trafficking from the separate crime of
migrant smuggling.

The Government of The Gambia does not fully comply with the
minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking; however, it is
making significant efforts to do so. Despite these efforts, the
government did not demonstrate increasing efforts to address
human trafficking over the previous year; therefore, The Gambia
is placed on Tier 2 Watch List. The Gambian government failed to
use its adequate anti-trafficking legal framework to investigate or
prosecute any suspected trafficking cases during the reporting
period. While it began to designate staff to serve on the National
Agency Against Trafficking in Persons, it did not complete efforts
to bring this agency into formal existence, as mandated by a 2007
law. The government claimed to monitor boys in street vending
and unaccompanied girls in resorts known to be destinations of
sex tourists, though it did not identify or provide protective
services to any victims among these populations.

For full report click here

____________________________________________________

US State Dept Terrorism Report 2009

No report available

____________________________________________________

Links:

Worldwide AML Legislation (International Bar Association)
Tables & Rankings
Are there Sanctions in force against it? (UN/EU/US)
N
?
Is it on FATF list of non-cooperative countries?
N
?
Is it on OECD list of uncooperative Tax Havens?
N
?
OECD - Implementation status of Tax Standard
 
?
Is it on EU 'white' list of equivalent jurisdictions?
N
?
Offshore Finance Center (Original IMF List)?
N
?
Is it on the US Secretary of Treasury list of jurisdictions of
Primary Money Laundering concern?
N
?
Is it on the US Secretary of State list of jurisdictions
identified to be supporters of International Terrorism?
N
?
Is it on US Department of State International Narcotics
Control Majors List?
N
?
US Dept of State Money Laundering assessment (INCSR)
M
?
Government Actions (For further info see INCRS below):
 
?
-  Criminalized Drug Money Laundering?
Y
 
-  Criminalized Beyond Drugs?
Y
 
-  Record Large Transactions?
Y
 
-  Maintain Records Over Time?
Y
 
-  Report Suspicious Transactions?(NMP)?
Y
 
-  Financial Intelligence Unit?
Y
 
-  System for Identifying/Forfeiting Assets?
Y
 
-  Arrangements for Asset Sharing?
N
 
-  Cooperates with International Law Enforcement?
Y
 
-  International Transportation of Currency?
Y
 
-  Ability to Freeze Terrorist Assets w/o Delay?
Y
 
-  Disclosure Protection "Safe Harbor"?
Y
 
-  Criminalized Financing of Terrorism?
Y
 
-  States Party to 1988 UN Convention?
Y
 
-  International Terrorism Financing Convention?
N
 
 
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
 
Corruption (Transparency International)
77 (out of
183)
91 (out of
178)
?
Ease of doing business (World Bank)
149 (out of
183)
146 (out
of 183)
?
FATF 40 + 9 recommendations
Mutual Evaluation Report: 2010
Further Tables
C
L
P
N
N/A
    C  -  Fully Compliant ,   
    L  -  Largely Compliant,    
    P  -  Partially Compliant    
    N  -  Non-Compliant
3
9
17
19
1
Legal Systems
 
1. Money Laundering Offence
P
 
14. Protection & no tipping-off
C
2. ML offence – mental element and
corporate liability
L
 
15. Internal controls,
compliance & audit
N
3. Confiscation and provisional
measures
L
 
16. DNFBP – R.13-15 & 21
N
4. Secrecy laws consistent with the
Recommendations
L
 
17. Sanctions
P
5. Customer due diligence
P
 
18. Shell banks
N
6. Politically exposed persons
P
 
19. Other forms of reporting
C
7. Correspondent banking
P
 
20. Other NFBP & secure
transaction techniques
N
8. New technologies & non
face-to-face business
L
 
21. Special attention for
higher risk countries
P
9. Third parties and introducers
N/A
 
22. Foreign branches &
subsidiaries
N
10. Record keeping
P
 
23. Regulation, supervision
and monitoring
N
11. Unusual transactions
L
 
24. DNFBP - regulation,
supervision and monitoring
N
12. Designated Non-Financial
Businesses and Professions – R.5,
6, 8-11
N
 
25. Guidelines & Feedback
N
13. Suspicious transaction reporting
N
     
Institutional and other
measures
 
26. The FIU
N
 
31. National co-operation
N
27. Law enforcement authorities
C
 
32. Statistics
N
28. Powers of competent authorities
L
 
33. Legal persons – beneficial
owners
P
29. Supervisors
N
 
34. Legal arrangements –
beneficial owners
P
30. Resources, integrity and training
N
 
 
 
International Co-operation
 
35. Conventions
L
 
38. MLA on confiscation and
freezing
P
36. Mutual legal assistance (MLA)
P
 
39. Extradition
P
37. Dual criminality
P
 
40. Other forms of
co-operation
P
Nine Special
Recommendations
 
SR.I Implement UN instruments
P
 
SR VI AML requirements for
money/value transfer services
N
SR.II Criminalise terrorist financing
L
 
SR VII Wire transfer rules
N
SR.III Freeze and confiscate terrorist
assets
P
 
SR.VIII Non profit
organisations
P
SR.IV Suspicious transaction
reporting
N
 
SR.IX Cross Border
Declaration & Disclosure
N
SR.V International co-operation
L
 
 
 
*Please note that FATF deems that a country has significant aml deficiencies if any
of the 'Core' Recommendations, R1, R5, R10, R13, SRII, or SRIV are rated either
Partially of Non-Compliant. These are marked in red.

For FATF to remove a country from the regular follow-up process, it has to be rated
Compliant or Largely Compliant in the above mentioned Core Recommendations
and the following Key Recommendations: -        

R3, R4, R23, R26, R35, R36, R40, SRI, SRIII, SRV

Please also note that any risk assessment should take into consideration all
follow-up reports.
GAMBIA
KnowYourCountry
-  Know Your Customer Provisions
Y
 
-  Criminalized Tipping Off?
Y
 
-  Report Suspected Terrorist Financing?
Y
 
-  State Party to United Nations TOC?
Y
 
-  State Party to United Nations CAC?
N
 
Local AML News / Sanctions
Tax Information
Business Information
Last Updated:   16 April 2012