Higher Risk
 
Medium Risk
 
Info n/a
 
Lower Risk
Sanctions:

None applicable

____________________________________________________

Offshore Jurisdiction Blacklists:

As a recognised offshore finance jurisdiction this country may fall
under various country offshore jurisdiction blacklists.

____________________________________________________

US State Department Money Laundering Report - 2012:

Isle of Man (IOM) is a British crown dependency, and while it has
its own parliament, government, and laws, the United Kingdom
(UK) remains constitutionally responsible for its defense and
international representation. Offshore banking, manufacturing,
and tourism are key sectors of the economy, and the government
offers incentives to high-technology companies and financial
institutions to locate on the island. Its large and sophisticated
financial center is potentially vulnerable to money laundering.
Most of the illicit funds in the IOM are from fraud schemes and
narcotics trafficking in other jurisdictions, including the UK. Identity
theft and Internet abuse are growing segments of financial crime
activity.

Do Financial Institutions engage in currency transactions related
to international narcotics trafficking that include significant
amounts of US currency; currency derived from illegal sales in the
U.S.; or that otherwise significantly affect the U.S.: No

Criminalization of Money Laundering:

“All serious crimes” approach or “list” approach to predicate
crimes: All serious crimes

Legal persons covered: criminally: YES civilly: YES

Know-your-customer (KYC) rules:

Enhanced due diligence procedures for PEPs: Foreign: YES
Domestic: YES

KYC covered entities: Banks; building societies; credit issuers;
financial leasing companies; money exchanges and remitters;
issuers of checks, traveler’s checks, money orders, electronic
money, or payment cards; guarantors; securities and commodities
futures brokers; safekeeping, portfolio and asset managers;
estate agents; auditors, accountants, lawyers and notaries;
insurance companies and intermediaries; casinos and
bookmakers; high-value goods dealers and auctioneers

Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) Requirements:

Number of STRs received and time frame: 1,435 in 2010

Number of CTRs received and time frame: Not applicable

STR covered entities: All businesses

Money Laundering Criminal Prosecutions/Convictions:

Prosecutions: 15 in 2010

Convictions: 13 in 2010

Records exchange mechanism:

With U.S.: MLAT: YES Other mechanism: YES

With other governments/jurisdictions: YES

Compliance with international standards was evaluated in a report
prepared by the International Monetary Fund’s Financial Sector
Assessment Program. The report can be found here: http://www.
imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2009/cr09275.pdf

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

IOM legislation provides powers to constables, including customs
officers, to investigate whether a person has benefited from any
criminal conduct. These powers allow information to be obtained
about that person’s financial affairs. These powers can be used to
assist in criminal investigations abroad as well as in the IOM. In
2003, the U.S. and the UK agreed to extend to the IOM the U.S.-
UK Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters.

The Terrorism (Finance) Act 2009 allows the IOM authorities to
compile their own list of suspects subject to sanctions when
appropriate.

IOM is a Crown Dependency and cannot sign or ratify
international conventions in its own right unless entrusted to do
so. Rather, the UK is responsible for IOM’s international affairs
and, at IOM’s request, may arrange for the ratification of any
convention to be extended to the Isle of Man. The UK’s ratification
of the 1988 UN Drug Convention was extended to include IOM on
December 2, 1993; its ratification of the UN Convention against
Corruption was extended to include the IOM on November 9,
2009; and its ratification of the International Convention for the
Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism was extended to IOM
on September 25, 2008. The UK has not extended the UN
Convention against Transnational Organized Crime to the IOM.

____________________________________________________

US State Dept Narcotics Report 2011 (introduction):

No report available


US State Dept Trafficking in Persons Report 2011
(introduction):

No report available


US State Dept Terrorism Report 2009

No report available
Tables & Rankings
Are there Sanctions in force against it? (UN/EU/US)
N
?
Is it on FATF list of non-cooperative countries?
N
?
Is it on OECD list of uncooperative Tax Havens?
N
?
OECD - Implementation status of Tax Standard
White
?
Is it on EU 'white' list of equivalent jurisdictions?
Qualifie
d
?
Offshore Finance Center (Original IMF List)?
Y
?
Is it on the US Secretary of Treasury list of jurisdictions of
Primary Money Laundering concern?
N
?
Is it on the US Secretary of State list of jurisdictions
identified to be supporters of International Terrorism?
N
?
Is it on US Department of State International Narcotics
Control Majors List?
N
?
US Dept of State Money Laundering assessment (INCSR)
PC
?
Government Actions (For further info see INCRS below):
 
?
-  Criminalized Drug Money Laundering?
Y
 
-  Criminalized Beyond Drugs?
Y
 
-  Record Large Transactions?
N
 
-  Maintain Records Over Time?
Y
 
-  Report Suspicious Transactions?(NMP)?
Y
 
-  Egmont Financial Intelligence Units?
Y
 
-  System for Identifying/Forfeiting Assets?
Y
 
-  Arrangements for Asset Sharing?
Y
 
-  Cooperates with International Law Enforcement?
Y
 
-  International Transportation of Currency?
Y
 
-  Ability to Free Terrorist Assets w/o Delay?
Y
 
-  Disclosure Protection "Safe Harbor"?
Y
 
-  Criminalized Financing of Terrorism?
Y
 
-  States Party to 1988 UN Convention?
Y
 
-  International Terrorism Financing Convention?
Y
 
 
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
 
Corruption (Transparency International)
N/A
N/A
?
Ease of doing business (World Bank)
N/A
N/A
?
Which Countries meet local
anti-money laundering
equivalence expectations
Argentina  Australia  Austria  Belgium  Bermuda  
Brazil  B.V.I.  Canada  Cayman Islands  Cyprus  
Denmark  Finland France  Germany  Gibraltar  
Greece  Guernsey  Hong Kong  Iceland  Ireland  
Italy  Japan  Jersey  Luxembourg Malta  
Mauritius  Monaco  Netherlands  New Zealand
Norway  Portugal  Singapore  South Africa  Spain  
Sweden Switzerland  United Kingdom  United
States of America
FATF 40 + 9 recommendations
Mutual Evaluation Report: 2009
Further Tables
C
L
P
N
N/A
    C  -  Fully Compliant ,   
    L  -  Largely Compliant,    
    P  -  Partially Compliant    
    N  -  Non-Compliant
12
24
13
0
0
Legal Systems
 
1. Money Laundering Offence
P
 
14. Protection & no tipping-off
P
2. ML offence – mental element and
corporate liability
L
 
15. Internal controls,
compliance & audit
L
3. Confiscation and provisional
measures
P
 
16. DNFBP – R.13-15 & 21
P
4. Secrecy laws consistent with the
Recommendations
L
 
17. Sanctions
L
5. Customer due diligence
P
 
18. Shell banks
C
6. Politically exposed persons
C
 
19. Other forms of reporting
C
7. Correspondent banking
C
 
20. Other NFBP & secure
transaction techniques
L
8. New technologies & non
face-to-face business
L
 
21. Special attention for
higher risk countries
L
9. Third parties and introducers
L
 
22. Foreign branches &
subsidiaries
C
10. Record keeping
C
 
23. Regulation, supervision
and monitoring
L
11. Unusual transactions
C
 
24. DNFBP - regulation,
supervision and monitoring
P
12. Designated Non-Financial
Businesses and Professions – R.5,
6, 8-11
P
 
25. Guidelines & Feedback
L
13. Suspicious transaction reporting
L
     
Institutional and other
measures
 
26. The FIU
L
 
31. National co-operation
C
27. Law enforcement authorities
L
 
32. Statistics
L
28. Powers of competent authorities
C
 
33. Legal persons –
beneficial owners
L
29. Supervisors
L
 
34. Legal arrangements –
beneficial owners
L
30. Resources, integrity and training
L
 
 
 
International Co-operation
 
35. Conventions
P
 
38. MLA on confiscation and
freezing
P
36. Mutual legal assistance (MLA)
C
 
39. Extradition
L
37. Dual criminality
C
 
40. Other forms of
co-operation
C
Nine Special
Recommendations
 
SR.I Implement UN instruments
P
 
SR VI AML requirements for
money/value transfer services
L
SR.II Criminalise terrorist financing
L
 
SR VII Wire transfer rules
L
SR.III Freeze and confiscate terrorist
assets
P
 
SR.VIII Non profit
organisations
L
SR.IV Suspicious transaction
reporting
P
 
SR.IX Cross Border
Declaration & Disclosure
L
SR.V International co-operation
P
 
 
 
*Please note that FATF deems that a country has significant aml deficiencies if any
of the 'Core' Recommendations, R1, R5, R10, R13, SRII, or SRIV are rated either
Partially of Non-Compliant. These are marked in red.

For FATF to remove a country from the regular follow-up process, it has to be rated
Compliant or Largely Compliant in the above mentioned Core Recommendations
and the following Key Recommendations: -        

R3, R4, R23, R26, R35, R36, R40, SRI, SRIII, SRV

Please also note that any risk assessment should take into consideration all
follow-up reports.
ISLE OF MAN
KnowYourCountry
-  Know Your Customer Provisions
Y
 
-  Criminalized Tipping Off?
Y
 
-  Report Suspected Terrorist Financing?
Y
 
-  State Party to United Nations TOC?
N
 
-  State Party to United Nations CAC?
Y
 
_________________________________________________________

AML News / Relevant Info

June 26, 2011  -  New report by the Global Forum on Transparency and
Exchange of Information to evaluate the country's legal and regulatory
frameworks and implementation re exchange of information is made
available.

Read Report


Links:

Worldwide AML Legislation (International Bar Association)
Local AML News / Sanctions
Tax Information
Business Information
Last Updated:   16 April 2012