



Sanctions:
None applicable
____________________________________________________
Offshore Jurisdiction Blacklists:
As a recognised offshore finance jurisdiction this country may fall
under various country offshore jurisdiction blacklists.
____________________________________________________
US State Department Money Laundering Report - 2012:
Isle of Man (IOM) is a British crown dependency, and while it has
its own parliament, government, and laws, the United Kingdom
(UK) remains constitutionally responsible for its defense and
international representation. Offshore banking, manufacturing,
and tourism are key sectors of the economy, and the government
offers incentives to high-technology companies and financial
institutions to locate on the island. Its large and sophisticated
financial center is potentially vulnerable to money laundering.
Most of the illicit funds in the IOM are from fraud schemes and
narcotics trafficking in other jurisdictions, including the UK. Identity
theft and Internet abuse are growing segments of financial crime
activity.
Do Financial Institutions engage in currency transactions related
to international narcotics trafficking that include significant
amounts of US currency; currency derived from illegal sales in the
U.S.; or that otherwise significantly affect the U.S.: No
Criminalization of Money Laundering:
“All serious crimes” approach or “list” approach to predicate
crimes: All serious crimes
Legal persons covered: criminally: YES civilly: YES
Know-your-customer (KYC) rules:
Enhanced due diligence procedures for PEPs: Foreign: YES
Domestic: YES
KYC covered entities: Banks; building societies; credit issuers;
financial leasing companies; money exchanges and remitters;
issuers of checks, traveler’s checks, money orders, electronic
money, or payment cards; guarantors; securities and commodities
futures brokers; safekeeping, portfolio and asset managers;
estate agents; auditors, accountants, lawyers and notaries;
insurance companies and intermediaries; casinos and
bookmakers; high-value goods dealers and auctioneers
Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) Requirements:
Number of STRs received and time frame: 1,435 in 2010
Number of CTRs received and time frame: Not applicable
STR covered entities: All businesses
Money Laundering Criminal Prosecutions/Convictions:
Prosecutions: 15 in 2010
Convictions: 13 in 2010
Records exchange mechanism:
With U.S.: MLAT: YES Other mechanism: YES
With other governments/jurisdictions: YES
Compliance with international standards was evaluated in a report
prepared by the International Monetary Fund’s Financial Sector
Assessment Program. The report can be found here: http://www.
imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2009/cr09275.pdf
Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:
IOM legislation provides powers to constables, including customs
officers, to investigate whether a person has benefited from any
criminal conduct. These powers allow information to be obtained
about that person’s financial affairs. These powers can be used to
assist in criminal investigations abroad as well as in the IOM. In
2003, the U.S. and the UK agreed to extend to the IOM the U.S.-
UK Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters.
The Terrorism (Finance) Act 2009 allows the IOM authorities to
compile their own list of suspects subject to sanctions when
appropriate.
IOM is a Crown Dependency and cannot sign or ratify
international conventions in its own right unless entrusted to do
so. Rather, the UK is responsible for IOM’s international affairs
and, at IOM’s request, may arrange for the ratification of any
convention to be extended to the Isle of Man. The UK’s ratification
of the 1988 UN Drug Convention was extended to include IOM on
December 2, 1993; its ratification of the UN Convention against
Corruption was extended to include the IOM on November 9,
2009; and its ratification of the International Convention for the
Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism was extended to IOM
on September 25, 2008. The UK has not extended the UN
Convention against Transnational Organized Crime to the IOM.
____________________________________________________
US State Dept Narcotics Report 2011 (introduction):
No report available
US State Dept Trafficking in Persons Report 2011
(introduction):
No report available
US State Dept Terrorism Report 2009
No report available
|
Are there Sanctions in force against it? (UN/EU/US)
|
|
|
|
Is it on FATF list of non-cooperative countries?
|
|
|
|
Is it on OECD list of uncooperative Tax Havens?
|
|
|
|
OECD - Implementation status of Tax Standard
|
|
|
|
Is it on EU 'white' list of equivalent jurisdictions?
|
|
|
|
Offshore Finance Center (Original IMF List)?
|
|
|
|
Is it on the US Secretary of Treasury list of jurisdictions of Primary Money Laundering concern?
|
|
|
|
Is it on the US Secretary of State list of jurisdictions identified to be supporters of International Terrorism?
|
|
|
|
Is it on US Department of State International Narcotics Control Majors List?
|
|
|
|
US Dept of State Money Laundering assessment (INCSR)
|
|
|
|
Government Actions (For further info see INCRS below):
|
|
|
|
- Criminalized Drug Money Laundering?
|
|
|
|
- Criminalized Beyond Drugs?
|
|
|
|
- Record Large Transactions?
|
|
|
|
- Maintain Records Over Time?
|
|
|
|
- Report Suspicious Transactions?(NMP)?
|
|
|
|
- Egmont Financial Intelligence Units?
|
|
|
|
- System for Identifying/Forfeiting Assets?
|
|
|
|
- Arrangements for Asset Sharing?
|
|
|
|
- Cooperates with International Law Enforcement?
|
|
|
|
- International Transportation of Currency?
|
|
|
|
- Ability to Free Terrorist Assets w/o Delay?
|
|
|
|
- Disclosure Protection "Safe Harbor"?
|
|
|
|
- Criminalized Financing of Terrorism?
|
|
|
|
- States Party to 1988 UN Convention?
|
|
|
|
- International Terrorism Financing Convention?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Corruption (Transparency International)
|
|
|
|
|
Ease of doing business (World Bank)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which Countries meet local anti-money laundering equivalence expectations
|
|
Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Bermuda Brazil B.V.I. Canada Cayman Islands Cyprus Denmark Finland France Germany Gibraltar Greece Guernsey Hong Kong Iceland Ireland Italy Japan Jersey Luxembourg Malta Mauritius Monaco Netherlands New Zealand Norway Portugal Singapore South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom United States of America
|
|
FATF 40 + 9 recommendations
|
|
Mutual Evaluation Report: 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C - Fully Compliant , L - Largely Compliant, P - Partially Compliant N - Non-Compliant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Money Laundering Offence
|
|
|
|
14. Protection & no tipping-off
|
|
|
2. ML offence – mental element and corporate liability
|
|
|
|
15. Internal controls, compliance & audit
|
|
|
3. Confiscation and provisional measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Secrecy laws consistent with the Recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Customer due diligence
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Politically exposed persons
|
|
|
|
19. Other forms of reporting
|
|
|
|
|
|
20. Other NFBP & secure transaction techniques
|
|
|
8. New technologies & non face-to-face business
|
|
|
|
21. Special attention for higher risk countries
|
|
|
9. Third parties and introducers
|
|
|
|
22. Foreign branches & subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
23. Regulation, supervision and monitoring
|
|
|
|
|
|
24. DNFBP - regulation, supervision and monitoring
|
|
|
12. Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions – R.5, 6, 8-11
|
|
|
|
25. Guidelines & Feedback
|
|
|
13. Suspicious transaction reporting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional and other measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
31. National co-operation
|
|
|
27. Law enforcement authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
28. Powers of competent authorities
|
|
|
|
33. Legal persons – beneficial owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
34. Legal arrangements – beneficial owners
|
|
|
30. Resources, integrity and training
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Co-operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
38. MLA on confiscation and freezing
|
|
|
36. Mutual legal assistance (MLA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40. Other forms of co-operation
|
|
|
Nine Special Recommendations
|
|
|
SR.I Implement UN instruments
|
|
|
|
SR VI AML requirements for money/value transfer services
|
|
|
SR.II Criminalise terrorist financing
|
|
|
|
SR VII Wire transfer rules
|
|
|
SR.III Freeze and confiscate terrorist assets
|
|
|
|
SR.VIII Non profit organisations
|
|
|
SR.IV Suspicious transaction reporting
|
|
|
|
SR.IX Cross Border Declaration & Disclosure
|
|
|
SR.V International co-operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Please note that FATF deems that a country has significant aml deficiencies if any
of the 'Core' Recommendations, R1, R5, R10, R13, SRII, or SRIV are rated either
Partially of Non-Compliant. These are marked in red.
For FATF to remove a country from the regular follow-up process, it has to be rated
Compliant or Largely Compliant in the above mentioned Core Recommendations
and the following Key Recommendations: -
R3, R4, R23, R26, R35, R36, R40, SRI, SRIII, SRV
Please also note that any risk assessment should take into consideration all
follow-up reports.
- Know Your Customer Provisions
|
|
|
- Criminalized Tipping Off?
|
|
|
|
- Report Suspected Terrorist Financing?
|
|
|
|
- State Party to United Nations TOC?
|
|
|
|
- State Party to United Nations CAC?
|
|
|
|
|
_________________________________________________________
AML News / Relevant Info
June 26, 2011 - New report by the Global Forum on Transparency and
Exchange of Information to evaluate the country's legal and regulatory
frameworks and implementation re exchange of information is made
available.
Read Report
Links:
Worldwide AML Legislation (International Bar Association)
Local AML News / Sanctions
|
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 16 April 2012
|