Higher Risk
 
Medium Risk
 
Info n/a
 
Lower Risk
Bilateral exchange of information
Agreements in place?
    No
Sanctions:

None applicable

____________________________________________________

Offshore Jurisdiction Blacklists:

Information unavailable.

____________________________________________________

US State Department Money Laundering Report - 2011:

Palau is not a regional or offshore financial center. The primary
sources of illegal proceeds are consumer marijuana sales,
prostitution, and illegal fishing by unlicensed foreign vessels.
Corruption in the governmental sector includes the misuse of
government funds and cronyism, in part due to Palau’s small size
and extensive family networks. Palau is a low-risk jurisdiction for
organized crime and terrorist financing.

Palau has one free trade zone, the Ngardmau Free Trade Zone
(NFTZ). A public corporation, Ngardmau Free Trade Zone
Authority, oversees the development of the NFTZ and issues
licenses for businesses to operate there. NFTZ licensing exempts
businesses from Foreign Investment Act requirements and certain
import and export taxes. To date, no development has taken
place within the area designated for the free trade zone and the
NFTZ directors continue to search for developers and investors.

DO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ENGAGE IN CURRENCY
TRANSACTIONS RELATED TO INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS
TRAFFICKING THAT INCLUDE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF US
CURRENCY; CURRENCY DERIVED FROM ILLEGAL SALES IN
THE U.S.; OR THAT OTHERWISE SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT THE
U.S.: NO

CRIMINALIZATION OF MONEY LAUNDERING:

“All serious crimes” approach or “list” approach to predicate
crimes: All serious crimes

Legal persons covered: criminally: YES civilly: YES

CRIMINALIZATION OF TERRORIST FINANCING:

Ability to freeze terrorist assets without delay: NO

UN lists of designated terrorists or terrorist entities distributed to
financial institutions: NO

(Please refer to the Department of State’s Country Reports on
Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.
gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

KNOW-YOUR-CUSTOMER RULES:

Covered entities: Banks, credit unions, and money remitters

Enhanced due diligence procedures for PEPs: Foreign: NO
Domestic: NO

SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:

Covered entities: Banks, credit unions, money remitters, and non-
governmental organizations

Number of STRs received and time frame: Not available

Number of CTRs received and time frame: Not available

MONEY LAUNDERING CRIMINAL
PROSECUTIONS/CONVICTIONS:

Prosecutions: Not available

Convictions: Not available

Assets forfeited: criminally: Not available civilly: Not available

RECORDS EXCHANGE MECHANISM:

With U.S.: YES

With other governments/jurisdictions: YES

Palau is a member of the Asia/Pacific Group on Money
Laundering (APG), a FATF-style regional body. Its most recent
mutual evaluation can be found here:

http://www.apgml.org/documents/docs/17/Palau%202008.pdf

ENFORCEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES AND
COMMENTS:

The Money Laundering Prevention and Control Act (MLPCA),
amended in 2007, addresses many of the deficiencies in the
Government of Palau’s (GOP) AML/CFT regime but does not
include all predicate crimes prescribed in the international
standards. However, the stronger measures are hampered by a
lack of human, financial, and structural capacity, along with an
absence of implementing regulations.

Significant deficiencies remain in the areas of customer due
diligence (CDD), record keeping, monitoring of transactions, and
supervision. The Financial Institutions Commission (FIC) is the
AML/CFT supervisor, but it does not have the resources to ensure
AML/CFT compliance nor to issue any regulations. The
designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs)
operating in Palau are not covered by the MLPCA.

The Palau Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) is responsible for
receiving and analyzing SARs, along with tracing, seizing, and
freezing assets, but lacks a dedicated budget and staff. The
GOP, with assistance from the Pacific Anti-Money Laundering
Program (PALP) mentor, organized a multi-agency SAR review
team to review the reports and help identify and initiate
investigations. The multi-agency approach has enabled the FIU to
function given its limitations of manpower and funding, and has
fostered information sharing and joint investigations between the
relevant law enforcement agencies. It is not, however, a long-term
solution, and the GOP should dedicate funds and permanent staff
to the FIU.

The Cash Courier Disclosure Act has been used successfully by
Palau Customs and Security to make bulk cash currency seizures
at the airport. The GOP should extend its excellent monitoring of
the airport to all its border points of entry and exit to protect
against the smuggling of bulk cash, narcotics and other
contraband.

Palau’s Counter-Terrorism Act specifically addresses its obligation
under UN Security Council Resolution 1373. However, it does not
adequately address provisional measures of seizing of evidence
and property and the freezing of capital and financial transactions
related to the financing of terrorism. Palau should strengthen its
ability to freeze and confiscate assets related to the financing of
terrorism. The GOP should circulate the UNSCR 1267 Sanctions
Committee’s consolidated list of terrorist entities. Palau should
also become a party to the 1988 UN Drug Convention, the UN
Convention against Corruption, and the UN Convention against
Transnational Organized Crime.

____________________________________________________

US State Dept Narcotics Report 2011 (introduction):

No report available

____________________________________________________

US State Dept Trafficking in Persons Report 2011
(introduction):

(Tier 2)

Palau is a destination country for women from countries in the
Asia-Pacific region who are subjected to forced prostitution and
people from the Philippines, China, and Bangladesh who are
subjected to conditions of forced labor. The foreign population
including workers and dependents is an estimated 5,000 — more
than one-third of the county’s population of 14,000 — with the
majority from the Philippines, China, and Bangladesh. Some
reports indicate that employers recruit foreign men and women to
work in Palau through fraudulent representation of contract terms
and conditions of employment. Some foreign workers pay
thousands of dollars in recruitment fees and willingly migrate to
Palau for jobs in domestic service, agriculture, or construction but
are subsequently coerced to work in situations significantly
different than what their contracts stipulated. Excessive hours
without pay, threats of physical or financial harm, confiscation of
their travel documents, and the withholding of salary payments
are used as tools of coercion to obtain and maintain their
compelled service. Some women from China and the Philippines
migrate to Palau expecting to work as waitresses or clerks, but are
subsequently forced into prostitution in karaoke bars and
massage parlors. Non-citizens are officially excluded from the
minimum wage law, and new regulations make it extremely difficult
for foreign workers to change employers, consequently increasing
their vulnerability to involuntary servitude and debt bondage.

The Government of Palau does not fully comply with the minimum
standards for the elimination of trafficking; however, it is making
significant efforts to do so. The government has a comprehensive
anti-trafficking law, though it did not investigate or prosecute any
trafficking cases during the year, including neither of two reported
trafficking cases brought to their attention, one for the forced
labor of a Filipina domestic worker, and one for the forced
prostitution of several Filipina women recruited for waitressing. In
the past, the government worked with the local Catholic Church to
offer victim protection services, but did not assist any victims
through this mechanism during the reporting period year. The
government made some efforts to raise awareness of or prevent
trafficking during the year.

For full report click here

____________________________________________________

US State Dept Terrorism Report 2009

Palau worked closely with the United States on counterterrorism.
Local law enforcement officers from the Ministry of Justice,
Ministry of Public Infrastructure, Industries and Commerce, and
the Division of Customs continued to receive training on
counterterrorism from U.S. counterparts. In addition, the Federal
Aviation Administration and the Transportation Security
Administration regularly inspected airport facilities and trained
airport officials on security procedures.

Responding to UN Security Council Resolution 1373, the national
congress passed a Foreign Evidence Act, a Money Laundering
and Proceeds of Crime Act, a Mutual Assistance in Criminal
Matters Act, and an Extradition and Transfer Act in 2001. These
laws are intended to regulate the banking system, criminalize
money laundering, and provide a legal basis for international law
enforcement cooperation. A Financial Intelligence Unit was
established to detect money laundering and other financial crimes.

____________________________________________________

Links:

Worldwide AML Legislation (International Bar Association)
Tables & Rankings
Are there Sanctions in force against it? (UN/EU/US)
N
?
Is it on FATF list of non-cooperative countries?
N
?
Is it on OECD list of uncooperative Tax Havens?
N
?
OECD - Implementation status of Tax Standard
 
?
Is it on EU 'white' list of equivalent jurisdictions?
N
?
Offshore Finance Center (Original IMF List)?
N
?
Is it on the US Secretary of Treasury list of jurisdictions of
Primary Money Laundering concern?
N
?
Is it on the US Secretary of State list of jurisdictions
identified to be supporters of International Terrorism?
N
?
Is it on US Department of State International Narcotics
Control Majors List?
N
?
US Dept of State Money Laundering assessment (INCSR)
M
?
Government Actions (For further info see INCRS below):
 
?
-  Criminalized Drug Money Laundering?
Y
 
-  Criminalized Beyond Drugs?
Y
 
-  Record Large Transactions?
Y
 
-  Maintain Records Over Time?
Y
 
-  Report Suspicious Transactions?(NMP)?
Y
 
-  Financial Intelligence Unit?
Y
 
-  System for Identifying/Forfeiting Assets?
N
 
-  Arrangements for Asset Sharing?
N
 
-  Cooperates with International Law Enforcement?
Y
 
-  International Transportation of Currency?
Y
 
-  Ability to Freeze Terrorist Assets w/o Delay?
Y
 
-  Disclosure Protection "Safe Harbor"?
Y
 
-  Criminalized Financing of Terrorism?
Y
 
-  States Party to 1988 UN Convention?
N
 
-  International Terrorism Financing Convention?
Y
 
 
Ranking
2011
Ranking
2010
 
Corruption (Transparency International)
N/A
N/A
?
Ease of doing business (World Bank)
116 (out of
183)
120 (out
of 183)
?
FATF 40 + 9 recommendations
Mutual Evaluation Report: 2008
Further Tables
C
L
P
N
N/A
    C  -  Fully Compliant ,   
    L  -  Largely Compliant,    
    P  -  Partially Compliant    
    N  -  Non-Compliant
4
10
17
18
0
Legal Systems
 
1. Money Laundering Offence
P
 
14. Protection & no tipping-off
L
2. ML offence – mental element and
corporate liability
C
 
15. Internal controls,
compliance & audit
P
3. Confiscation and provisional
measures
P
 
16. DNFBP – R.13-15 & 21
N
4. Secrecy laws consistent with the
Recommendations
C
 
17. Sanctions
L
5. Customer due diligence
N
 
18. Shell banks
P
6. Politically exposed persons
N
 
19. Other forms of reporting
C
7. Correspondent banking
N
 
20. Other NFBP & secure
transaction techniques
L
8. New technologies & non
face-to-face business
N
 
21. Special attention for
higher risk countries
N
9. Third parties and introducers
N
 
22. Foreign branches &
subsidiaries
N
10. Record keeping
N
 
23. Regulation, supervision
and monitoring
N
11. Unusual transactions
N
 
24. DNFBP - regulation,
supervision and monitoring
N
12. Designated Non-Financial
Businesses and Professions – R.5,
6, 8-11
N
 
25. Guidelines & Feedback
N
13. Suspicious transaction reporting
P
     
Institutional and other
measures
 
26. The FIU
P
 
31. National co-operation
L
27. Law enforcement authorities
L
 
32. Statistics
N
28. Powers of competent authorities
L
 
33. Legal persons –
beneficial owners
P
29. Supervisors
P
 
34. Legal arrangements –
beneficial owners
P
30. Resources, integrity and training
P
 
 
 
International Co-operation
 
35. Conventions
P
 
38. MLA on confiscation and
freezing
P
36. Mutual legal assistance (MLA)
P
 
39. Extradition
L
37. Dual criminality
L
 
40. Other forms of
co-operation
C
Nine Special
Recommendations
 
SR.I Implement UN instruments
P
 
SR VI AML requirements for
money/value transfer services
N
SR.II Criminalise terrorist financing
L
 
SR VII Wire transfer rules
N
SR.III Freeze and confiscate terrorist
assets
N
 
SR.VIII Non profit
organisations
P
SR.IV Suspicious transaction
reporting
P
 
SR.IX Cross Border
Declaration & Disclosure
L
SR.V International co-operation
P
 
 
 
*Please note that FATF deems that a country has significant aml deficiencies if any
of the 'Core' Recommendations, R1, R5, R10, R13, SRII, or SRIV are rated either
Partially of Non-Compliant. These are marked in red.

For FATF to remove a country from the regular follow-up process, it has to be rated
Compliant or Largely Compliant in the above mentioned Core Recommendations
and the following Key Recommendations: -        

R3, R4, R23, R26, R35, R36, R40, SRI, SRIII, SRV

Please also note that any risk assessment should take into consideration all
follow-up reports.
PALAU
KnowYourCountry
-  Know Your Customer Provisions
Y
 
-  Criminalized Tipping Off?
Y
 
-  Report Suspected Terrorist Financing?
Y
 
-  State Party to United Nations TOC?
N
 
-  State Party to United Nations CAC?
N
 
Local AML News / Sanctions
Tax Information
Business Information
Last Updated:   16 April 2012