Skip to content
Latvia

Brief summary:

Latvia

Lower Risk

Back to country list

Risk Indicators

  • FATF/EU Blacklist/Greylist (Lower Concern)
  • Terrorism Financing (Lower Concern)
  • US Dept of State INCSR
  • Proliferation Financing
  • Corruption
  • Criminality
  • Resilience & Governance
  • Financial Transparency
  • Offshore Finance Centres
  • Sanctions

Background

Latvia’s modern identity emerged from the medieval union of eastern Baltic tribes, followed by successive periods of German, Polish, Swedish, and Russian control. A republic formed after World War I, was annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940, and restored its independence in 1991, while the position of its sizeable Russian minority remains a point of concern. European and transatlantic integration has since deepened through membership in NATO, the EU, the euro zone, and the OECD.

Latvia’s security environment is shaped by its borders with Estonia, Lithuania, Russia, and Belarus, alongside the wider consequences of Russia’s war against Ukraine. Russia and Belarus present the most acute challenges through military pressure, hybrid activity, political repression, and extensive sanctions-evasion networks, while Estonia and Lithuania face related cyber, sabotage, and border risks. Recent Lithuanian enforcement action, supported by EU anti-fraud authorities, underscores the region’s exposure to rerouted sanctioned goods even as Estonia reports no comparable major domestic cases.

Get full access

AML & Terrorist Financing

Latvia is no longer regarded as a regional non-resident banking hub, with current money-laundering threats linked mainly to the shadow economy, fraud, corruption, and foreign criminal proceeds entering the Latvian financial system. The 2026 FATF follow-up assessment recognised strengthened institutions, including FIU Latvia and Latvijas Banka, while pointing to continuing challenges involving DNFBP supervision, large-scale cases with foreign or unknown offenders, and the prosecution of legal persons. Terrorist-financing risk is considered low and the framework is substantially effective, although limited investigations, the recent sanctions role of FIU Latvia, and uneven understanding of UN-specific obligations among some DNFBPs leave areas requiring close attention.

Get full access

Sanctions

Latvia enforces United Nations and European Union sanctions, with particular focus on restrictions targeting Russia and Belarus, including controls on goods, technologies, financial services, and transit. Following the April 2024 reform, the Latvian Financial Intelligence Unit serves as the central sanctions authority, working with customs, banks, and the State Security Service to investigate suspected rerouting through Central Asia, China, Hong Kong, and the UAE. No international sanctions are currently reported as being in force against Latvia, although its position as a regional trade hub leaves it exposed to continuing sanctions-evasion risks.

Get full access

Criminality

Corruption and its perception remain persistent concerns in Latvia, particularly around public procurement, conflicts of interest, and the limited number of corruption prosecutions, despite the legal framework and the role of the Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau (KNAB). Criminal activity includes human trafficking and smuggling, illicit tobacco and firearms trade, drug transit, and increasingly sophisticated online and financial fraud, with money laundering and private-sector misconduct adding further complexity.

Get full access

Reports

Latvia is making significant progress against human trafficking through increased prosecutions, victim services, NGO funding, child-protection reforms, and training initiatives, including outreach to Ukrainians, while remaining on Tier 2 due to gaps in convictions, proactive police screening, and a centralized referral system. Risks span sex and labor trafficking involving children, women, guest workers, refugees, and marginalized people, with reported vulnerabilities in sham marriages, online recruitment, fish processing, construction, agriculture, and forced begging, alongside concerns identified by the State Labor Inspectorate and civil society about underreporting.

Get full access

Industry/Product Sector Risk

Latvia’s financial and non-financial sectors present a varied risk profile, with heightened exposure in retail banking, casinos, money remitters, cash-intensive businesses, public works, and transportation linked to cross-border flows, shadow-economy activity, and organised crime. Latvijas Banka, the State Revenue Service, and the Lotteries and Gambling Supervisory Inspectorate oversee key sectors where vulnerabilities include complex ownership, remote or occasional customer relationships, rapid movement of funds, and the use of professional or commercial structures to obscure proceeds. Particular areas of interest include foreign tax and fraud proceeds, corruption, excise-goods smuggling, cyber-enabled crime, real estate, virtual assets, and the evolving impact of Latvia’s EU-border and transit-country position.

Get full access

Economy & Investment Climate

Latvia combines a strategic Baltic logistics position, EU and Eurozone integration, competitive labor costs, and investment opportunities supported by the Latvian Investment and Development Agency, free ports, and special economic zones. While inflation has eased and the economy remains diversified across services, manufacturing, technology, and transportation, investors must weigh geopolitical uncertainty, a contracting manufacturing base, labor shortages, demographic pressures, energy costs, shadow-economy concerns, and questions highlighted by FICIL’s Sentiment Index regarding procurement transparency.

Get full access

Cryptocurrency Regulations

Latvia permits cryptocurrency activity as an asset-based sector rather than recognizing digital currencies as legal tender, with the Financial Intelligence Unit, State Revenue Service, and Bank of Latvia shaping oversight through AML controls, registration requirements, and evolving EU-aligned standards. Tax treatment, transaction recordkeeping, and future MiCA licensing—including white-paper obligations for certain token offerings—create a developing framework whose practical requirements merit closer examination.

Get full access

Get full access

The information on this page is a brief summary. Get access to EDD country reports, all risk category scores and customisable weightings for 245 jurisdictions. 

Book a demo

See our plans

Ask us a question