Risk Indicators
- FATF/EU Blacklist/Greylist (Lower Concern)
- Terrorism Financing (Lower Concern)
- US Dept of State INCSR
- Proliferation Financing
- Corruption
- Criminality
- Resilience & Governance
- Financial Transparency
- Offshore Finance Centres
- Sanctions
Background
Mauritius emerged from Dutch and French settlement into a plantation economy shaped by slavery, sugar, and later contracted labor from the Indian subcontinent, whose descendants now comprise most of its population. British rule preserved much of the French administrative and linguistic legacy while adding strategic importance through naval, air, convoy, and signals-intelligence activities. These layers of colonial history remain visible in the country’s institutions, demographics, and legal traditions.
Since independence in 1968, Mauritius has maintained competitive elections, democratic stability, and comparatively strong economic performance, despite coalition politics often centered on the Jugnauth and Ramgoolam families. Its modern political history also includes the unusual succession of father-and-son prime ministers and the tenure of Paul Raymond Berenger, the only non-Hindu prime minister since independence. Sovereignty claims involving Tromelin and the Chagos Archipelago continue to shape its external affairs, with support reflected in United Nations General Assembly resolutions and an International Court of Justice advisory opinion.
AML & Terrorist Financing
Mauritius has made significant AML/CFT progress, exiting FATF increased monitoring in 2021 and achieving compliant or largely compliant ratings on most recommendations, while remaining in enhanced follow-up with ESAAMLG. Nevertheless, earlier ESAAMLG findings highlighted uneven risk understanding, low reporting by DNFBPs and global-business entities, limited risk-based supervision by the FSC, and continuing questions around beneficial ownership, enforcement capacity, and financial investigations. Terrorist-financing and proliferation-financing controls were assessed as having low effectiveness, with concerns involving targeted sanctions, NPO vulnerabilities, investigative capability, and legal gaps despite the roles of the BoM, FIU, ICAC, and newer Financial Crimes Commission.
Sanctions
Mauritius enforces United Nations sanctions measures, including compliance relating to Iran and the DPRK under its 2019 Sanctions Act, while also supporting broader Security Council regimes involving arms, travel, financial, and commodity restrictions. No international or country-specific sanctions are in force against Mauritius under UN, EU, US, or UK frameworks as of mid-2026, although its financial-hub role creates exposure to potential secondary-sanctions risks. Concerns involving Mauritius-based intermediaries, shell companies, hawala networks, maritime obfuscation, and the Financial Services Commission’s capacity to screen complex transactions point to continuing challenges surrounding sanctions evasion linked to Iran, North Korea, Houthi networks, and Somalia.
Criminality
Mauritius experiences relatively limited corruption by regional standards, yet nepotism, opaque political financing, procurement concerns, and high-profile cases involving senior officials continue to fuel distrust, with the Missie Moustass leaks intensifying questions about political and judicial influence. Persistent criminal activity includes heroin and synthetic-drug trafficking, human trafficking, financial fraud, cybercrime, and counterfeit trade, while the restructuring of the Financial Crimes Commission and the restoration of the Director of Public Prosecutions’ powers signal important but still untested changes in accountability.
Reports
Mauritius remains on Tier 2 as authorities show increased efforts, including the Mauritius Police Force’s specialized TIP Unit, a recent trafficker conviction, and labor-screening measures by the Ministry of Labor’s Special Migrant Workers Unit. Significant vulnerabilities persist, however, spanning child and online sexual exploitation, forced drug carrying, migrant labor abuse, and exploitation aboard fishing vessels, while adult victim protections and trauma-informed support remain limited.
Industry/Product Sector Risk
Mauritius’s financial and business landscape combines a substantial cross-border global business segment with cash-intensive activities, creating heightened exposure across retail and correspondent banking, investment funds, securities, wealth management, real estate, casinos, trade finance, and trust and company services. Vulnerabilities commonly involve complex ownership structures, non-resident customers, cross-border transactions, cash movement, trade-based laundering, and limited suspicious transaction reporting in parts of the DNFBP and other sectors, with construction, hospitality, transportation, politics, and charities adding further areas of concern. Oversight is distributed among bodies including the Bank of Mauritius, Financial Services Commission, Financial Intelligence Unit, Gambling Regulatory Authority, Mauritius Institute of Professional Accountants, and Financial Reporting Council, whose sector-specific roles offer important context for the varying risk profiles.
Economy & Investment Climate
Mauritius has evolved from a sugar-based economy into a diversified, service-led and outward-facing hub, with recent growth supported by tourism, construction, financial services and manufacturing, while Statistics Mauritius and the Bank of Mauritius point to a broader recovery alongside ongoing exposure to external shocks. Its investment appeal rests on the Economic Development Board, sophisticated financial infrastructure, extensive trade links and streamlined digital business systems, although the OECD’s 2024 review and the World Bank’s private-sector analysis highlight structural, skills and governance challenges as the country pursues fintech, renewable energy, healthcare and other higher-value opportunities.
Cryptocurrency Regulations
Mauritius permits cryptocurrency activity under the VAITOS Act, with the Financial Services Commission overseeing licensed virtual asset providers, token offerings, AML/CFT controls, and market safeguards, while digital assets remain distinct from legal tender. Tax treatment, transaction reporting, token classifications, and evolving areas such as NFTs, airdrops, and hard forks involve the Income Tax Act, Value Added Tax Act, and Mauritius Revenue Authority, leaving important practical details to examine closely.
Get full access
The information on this page is a brief summary. Get access to EDD country reports, all risk category scores and customisable weightings for 245 jurisdictions.