Risk Indicators
- FATF/EU Blacklist/Greylist (Lower Concern)
- Terrorism Financing (Lower Concern)
- US Dept of State INCSR
- Proliferation Financing
- Corruption
- Criminality
- Resilience & Governance
- Financial Transparency
- Offshore Finance Centres
- Sanctions
Background
Peru’s history reflects the transition from the Inca Empire and Spanish conquest to independence in 1821, followed by periods of military rule, democratic restoration, economic upheaval, and insurgent violence. The 1990s brought economic recovery and reduced guerrilla activity under Alberto Fujimori, even as authoritarian practices and public dissatisfaction intensified. Since then, presidents including Alejandro Toledo, Alan García, Ollanta Humala, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, Martín Vizcarra, and Pedro Castillo have been associated with a politically unsettled succession of elections, impeachments, resignations, and institutional confrontations.
More recently, the Peruvian Congress, executive authorities, and constitutional mechanisms have figured prominently in repeated leadership crises, culminating in Dina Boluarte’s assumption of the presidency in 2022. Peru’s severe crime wave, institutional decay, and political instability are closely linked to broader regional pressures involving drug trafficking, organized crime, corruption, migration, and social unrest. Conditions in Ecuador, Colombia, Bolivia, Brazil, and Chile—including armed groups, criminal networks, targeted sanctions, and persistent evasion—add further complexity to Peru’s security environment.
AML & Terrorist Financing
Peru has a broadly developed AML/CFT framework and is not listed by FATF as having strategic deficiencies, although the 2020 follow-up evaluation found uneven technical compliance and no highly effective areas. Major vulnerabilities include illegal mining, corruption, drug trafficking, informality, cash use, and property- and trade-based laundering, while enforcement remains constrained by weak coordination, justice-sector corruption, limited convictions, and uneven supervision of DNFBPs and smaller mining operations. The UIF-Peru and SBS generate and oversee significant financial intelligence, but challenges persist around STR quality, beneficial ownership access through SUNAT, and investigative capacity, while terrorist-financing controls appear stronger in targeted sanctions than in the consistency of prosecutions and designation procedures.
Sanctions
Peru is obligated to implement United Nations Security Council measures, while no international sanctions are currently in force against the Peruvian state itself. External sanctions exposure nevertheless includes Peruvian individuals and entities listed by the U.S. under counter-narcotics authorities, OFAC designations involving R Inver Corp and SBK Import, and the continued designation of Sendero Luminoso by U.S., EU, and other regimes. Concerns center on Peru’s potential use as an evasion corridor, with activity linked to Callao and Chancay, Iranian-associated vessels such as Frunze and Izumo, Mexican cartel networks, and maritime or narcotics operations involving sanctioned parties.
Criminality
Peru faces widespread, systemic corruption involving bribery, embezzlement, collusion, extortion, and fraud across government, justice, politics, and public works, alongside persistent trafficking, illegal mining and logging, drug production, extortion, and financial crime. Investigations have pointed to the involvement of officials and other state-embedded actors, while bodies such as the Contraloría, the Secretariat of Public Integrity, and Proética operate amid concerns over procurement, organized criminal networks, and limited transparency.
Reports
Peru’s counternarcotics and security landscape remains shaped by coca cultivation, cocaine trafficking, illegal mining, and the continued presence of Shining Path remnants and transnational groups such as Tren de Aragua, even as cooperation involving DEVIDA, the PNP, DIRCOTE, and U.S. agencies produces notable seizures, arrests, and intelligence gains. At the same time, trafficking risks extend from remote Amazonian and mining regions to online networks and migrant communities, with official corruption, limited services, and institutional turnover complicating efforts to protect victims, prosecute offenders, and strengthen the rule of law.
Industry/Product Sector Risk
Peru’s financial and non-financial sectors present varied exposure to money laundering and terrorist financing, with particularly pronounced concerns around cash-intensive activities, retail banking, casinos, currency exchange, real estate, mining, forestry, politics, public works and transportation. Oversight involves bodies including the FIU, SBS, MINCETUR, SMV and professional associations, while sector-specific assessments point to recurring vulnerabilities involving informality, beneficial-ownership opacity, cross-border flows, trade-based schemes and uneven risk-based controls. The underlying threats span drug trafficking, illegal mining and logging, corruption, smuggling, tax crimes, fraud and organised crime, with some emerging or less-developed areas—such as electronic money, remittances, accountants and lawyers—showing important differences in supervisory maturity and reporting activity.
Economy & Investment Climate
Peru’s economy has regained momentum under a generally prudent, market-oriented framework, with stronger growth, subdued inflation, resilient reserves, and investment-grade ratings, although political volatility and uneven public-service access continue to shape confidence. The country remains broadly open to foreign investment, with ProInversion promoting an extensive PPP pipeline and agencies such as BCRP and INDECOPI supporting financial and competitive stability, even as bureaucracy, informality, infrastructure gaps, and social conflict present important practical considerations.
Cryptocurrency Regulations
Peru does not recognize cryptocurrency as legal tender, but its evolving framework brings virtual asset service providers under AML/CTF obligations, including KYC, transaction records, and the Travel Rule for transfers exceeding specified thresholds. Oversight by the SBS and UIF is expanding, while taxation, foreign-provider compliance, token offerings, and tokenization remain areas where important details are still developing.
Get full access
The information on this page is a brief summary. Get access to EDD country reports, all risk category scores and customisable weightings for 245 jurisdictions.